George Gascon, 66, is running as the progressive alternative to two-time incumbent Jackie Lacey, who has faced her own criticism for rising crime rates in Los Angeles.
Gascon rose through the ranks in law enforcement, having worked in the Los Angeles and Mesa, Ariz., police departments before replacing Kamala Harris as District Attorney of San Francisco in 2011.
During his time in office, between 2011 and 2019, property crime rates in San Francisco rose by 49% and violent crime increased by 15%, according to data from The Los Angeles Times.
Many blamed the surging crime rates on Gascon’s reluctance to prosecute low-level crimes, like car break-ins. But Gascon has argued that going after petty crimes is a waste of resources and would perpetuate the defendant’s cycle of crime.
His time as San Francisco D.A. sparked sharp division. Late last year, San Francisco Mayor London Breed and City Attorney Dennis Herrera refused to endorse his candidacy for Los Angeles District Attorney.
But on Tuesday, The Los Angeles Times editorial board threw their support behind him for his “reexamination to the entire criminal justice system” while San Francisco’s district attorney.
“Gascon is the right candidate at the right time in the largest local criminal justice jurisdiction in the United States,” the board wrote. “He brings with him the frontline experience of a cop who saw the tough-on-crime ethic wreak havoc in the communities he policed and is one of the few police leaders to question the old-style approach.”
In a Tuesday interview with ABC 7, Gascon pledged that, as district attorney, he would reopen investigations into four deadly police shootings that Lacey declined to prosecute.
Lacey has dismissed the pledge as a political stunt that risks creating “major ethical dilemmas that will damage the reputation and the prestige of this office which should always be an independent, apolitical institution.”
Despite his pledge to re-open cases involving deadly police shootings, Gascon did not prosecute any officers who were accused of fatal shootings. Gascon has justified this on account of having never been presented a case “where the police shot an unarmed person.”
“But in some cases, I came out publicly and said this is an unnecessary shooting,” he told ABC 7.